“Man achieves the height of wisdom when all that
he does is as self-evident as what nature does.”From the I Ching
Imagine the oldest photograph that exists in your family. It will probably show a now deceased great-grandfather captured in a flattened second, ceremoniously offering his best angle for the event. He will probably appear wearing some of his finest clothes, and his hair -possibly his mustache too- organized to its most decent presentation. Imagine him now preparing for the taking of the photograph, walking about the house selecting a spot, a chair, a jacket; then the event, the second worthy of future inspection that you can return to observe whenever you wish. After that, a return to regular activities not captured and rapidly forgotten.

What comes to mind when looking at such a picture? Among the many possibilities I want to focus on the sense of an earlier time. The photograph exposes just a moment filled with information about a time when things were a certain way, when taking a photograph involved a certain ritual, when clothes, furniture or people had a certain look. It is very difficult to think about any previous time without a whole ambiance coming to mind and without recognizing it as past. It is hard to see that great-grandfather's photograph and imagine that in his eyes everything looked current or even modern. To us that atmosphere is inevitably old and to our great-grandchildren so will ours, no matter how hard it is for us to picture what seems so immediate become obsolete.
Mankind's motion in time always carries an atmosphere, a sense of aesthetics. And in its motion the ambiance transforms, rejuvenates and the ideas also shift and get modified. The previous thought is abandoned to welcome the next over and over. In scientific thought we get a sense of advancement; we are all familiar with the fact that at some point the earth was thought flat, the static center of a rotating universe. It is almost a cliché to use that example to challenge a person too fixated on a theory: "How do you know that there aren't any aliens? don't you know that once people thought that the earth was flat and who ever said the contrary was evil and was burned? now we know it's round, so maybe one day we will know that there are aliens!" but this essay is not about defending the existence of aliens. The point I want to make is that our thought is perishable, it often has an expiration date. Of course there are known facts; the earth, most likely, will not be discovered to actually be flat. But given the permanent factor of the possibility and the existence of unsolved mysteries or enigmas, there will always be room for change, and discovery. Scientists looking for a model to explain the universe have increasingly become more sophisticated and difficult to understand; but they still face issues as what they call the 'uncertainty principle' which makes it almost impossible to understand what they call the 'elementary particles.' Scientists now have to build a system where the uncertainty principle is acknowledged; this shows that there will be space for speculation –about uncertainties- for as long as there are enigmas to get around.
As a contrast to the ever transforming world of mankind, we can observe nature. A picture of a tiger does not reveal an era, a time when tigers did things a certain way. The only thing that can reveal the time of a picture of an animal is what technology was used to document it; the animal
itself is not responsible because nature is permanent. Tigers are never out of style, outdated or modern. "Did you see the latest tiger they put out?" We will, hopefully, never hear a comment like that. Nature is, at the same time, ancient and new. There is nothing that transmits the sense of 'new' as the sunrise, and yet it has happened every day since days have existed.
It happened all the same when it was explained as the result of the sun going around the earth or vice versa. Nature remains as real and concrete as the biggest truth that we may ever find.
Although

it keeps getting harder to notice, we are a part of nature. When asked why he avoided representing the natural world, Jackson Pollock answered; "I am nature." He was right. We know, at some level, that we are some kind of fancy animal. The one that raises questions, that explains theories, that invents the world in which he lives. We know that we differ in many ways to the rest of existence on earth. However, it seems that the difference is somehow distancing the world from us. The world from which we sprung appears to be fading out.
The approach to nature, particularly from the western civilized point of view has been almost conflicting. The history of industrialization in North America carries an underlying story of mankind attempting to dominate, control and exploit nature. The manifest destiny declared, in favor of colonization, that Americans had a duty to educate more primitive people in the ways of using the resources given by god. I will not enter into detailing the many damages to the world that such knowledge has brought; I'll just state that there have been many. As a result, we live in a world were most of what we see is created by humans. Buildings, roads, cars, and almost everything that we encounter daily. The little that remains of nature inside civilization can often be upsetting; rats in the subway tracks, living off the residues that we discard, more of a problem than an animal. We still preserve, and just because it seems virtually impossible not to, the sky over or heads. Other than that, we have gradually replaced the given world with an invented one. Once in a while, however, a snowstorm comes in, and all that we built is covered by nature. The white cloth that reigns in the landscape, before it is disturbed, cleaned or removed, can make the spirit nostalgic.
I've always envied cultures with a more direct and friendly relationship with the world. For instance, the American Indians who seemed to be integrated to the ways of nature with more intensity. 'Black Elk Speaks,' is a book with the life-story of a holy man of the Oglala Sioux told by himself and documented in writing by John G. Neihardt. This is how it starts:
"My friend, I am going to tell you the story of my life, as you wish; and if it were only the story of my life I think I would not tell it; for what is one man that he should make much of his winters, even when they bend him like a heavy snow? So many other men have lived and shall live that story, to be grass upon the hills. It is the story of all life that is holy and is good to tell, and of us two-leggeds sharing in it with the four-leggeds and the wings of the air and all green things; for these are children of one mother and their father is one Spirit."
It is very evident a sense of belonging to the world and of communion with all that lives. That sense is not a part of daily life in a big city. Black Elk happened to be a holy man who apparently had special powers given to him in a vision when he was nine. Without getting into a discussion about believing or not in the supernatural, I will say that his wisdom is unquestionable and that it comes from his direct and clear relationship with the world.
But the way in which we relate to the planet is different. As I mentioned earlier, we have created an artificial substitute world to live in. The truth is, however, that there is no use in lamenting not being a holy man of the Sioux, however tempting. We can still find that sense of belonging even in the most industrialized street of the most urban of all cities because you may take a person out of nature, but you can't take the nature out of the person. No matter how much we shift ideas, discard theories and render our own inventions obsolete, we still have the permanence that is inherent in nature. The stories that we tell and the things that we do will always be the same under new presentation. The basic elements remain.
The sense of advancement and progress may seem natural and inevitable, but the truth is that all that we have created can be questioned. The essence of mankind, instead, has existed from the beginning, true -unquestionable- and deep. The highest wisdom has already happened in mankind's history as early as five thousand years ago. The highest stupidity has also been achieved probably since then, too. The defining elements in us, our nature, are as ancient as the species and as new as a new born. Our understanding and explaining of that nature, inside and outside of ourselves is what may improve. In that sense we may try and justify the idea of progress, but I think it is more a matter of movement because I'm not so sure that where we are is better than where we were. It is thought -one of the things that distinguish us from the other animals,- which has proven to be perishable, become outdated, and suffer the passing of time. It is thought that has made nature more distant, inside and outside ourselves. It is thought, also, what may bring it back. But it would have to be a different kind of thought; a way of thinking that understands the language in which the world speaks; the poetic language, the intuitive language, which imparts the knowledge that revolves around the mystery and the possibility within our own nature.